On days that I have way too much free time, I end up doing stuff like this: going to espn.com and looking at the projected statistics for the entire Indians team. What a life I live..
As you might already know, projected stats are basically the current statistics stretched out over the entire year. So if someone hits a homerun in the first game of the season, they are projected to hit 162 homeruns that year (that will never happen, except Ryan Garko in 2008). So here are some projected statistics for the Indians as of today (June 7th):

Very interesting, huh.. Some of those numbers don’t quite work out..for example, the Dellucci/Michaels combo is projected to have 800+ at bats, which I’m GUESSING they won’t get. Also, Perez only has 11 IP under his belt so far, but his projected stats look nice, don’t they?
Now, what would this be without some kind of reference to a movie? Nothing, that’s what. So we’re going spaghetti western today with The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. I will pick some different numbers from these projected stats that fall under the different categories.
The Good

The power numbers: The first six hitters are projected to hit 20+ homeruns. Four guys are projected to have 90+ RBI.
Victor Martinez: That looks like an MVP season..if he even comes anywhere close to that, as a catcher, that is an insane season.
Ryan Garko: Consistency and pretty decent power at .320 with 22 homers.
Kelly Shoppach: Those would be decent numbers for any catcher, but as a backup catcher..well, then he’s just showin off.
First half of the rotation: Well, obviously. They are projected to have a combined 55-10 record with ERAs ranging from 3.11 to 3.80.
C.C., Byrd, and Betancourt’s K/BB ratio: Pretty much the reason these guys are so successful right now.
Anybody named Rafael: Betancourt makes the bullpen decent. Perez, though in limited play, could only be better if he had a negative ERA. Fultz should change his name to Rafael as well, with his 1.65 ERA and the fact that he is keeping guys off the bases.
Borowski’s saves: I’d take 43 saves. On the other hand..his other numbers..(pulling my collar) yeeeeeeee.
The Bad

Hafner’s numbers: While .272 with 28 homers would be a good season for most, we all know Travis Hafner is more than mere mortal. He could be hitting .320 with a projected 50 homers and nobody would be that surprised. So to say this is bad is a stretch, I guess, but it is just so terribly un-Carl-Farbman-like (Seinfeld reference).
Corner outfielders: Between Michaels, Dellucci, and Trot, you are looking at a projected 28 homers from power positions. That’s not QUITE what you’d like from those spots.
Half of the bullpen: In Charles Dickens’ “Tale of Two Bullpens”, he writes about a group of pitchers (Betancourt, Fultz, and Perez) who are effective and help the team win, then he unfortunately writes about another group (Mastny, Cabrera, and Hernandez) who all have 5.00+ ERAs and are letting close to 1.5-2 runners on per inning (that .5 is when someone like Eddie Gaedel reaches base). I’ve tried to contact Mr. Dickens to tell him to erase the part about the second bullpen, but I found out he’s been dead for over 130 years. As a note of interest, Roberto Hernandez was actually Dickens’ best man. I should lay off the Hernandez-old jokes, but they are too fun.
The Ugly

Half of the rotation: I saved this for the ugly section. Out of Lee, Sowers, and Westbrook, the best ERA is Lee’s 6.35. At their current pace, they are on their way to a smooth 11-28 record, which I think even the Royals would laugh at. Ugly in its own right is Sowers’ 0.76 K/BB ratio. He is the anti-Byrd right now and I hope that he’ll turn it around somehow.
Borowski’s ERA: In a perfect world, your closer comes in, gets the other team 1-2-3, and girls like geeky guys named Tony and Cory. In the Cleveland Indians world, your closer comes in, you take a few shots of Pepto Bismol, and geeky guys named Cory sit at home and write about the projected stats of a baseball team. Basically, what I’m saying is..if Borowski’s ERA was 1.29 instead of 7.29, my life would be totally different.
Mike Rouse: Now, I’m sure Rouse is a nice guy and all but I am not a big fan of the numbers he has put up. You might say…the numbers and I…we don’t get along. It’s not a huge deal, since he isn’t played too often anyway. So that means, even with the feud between me and his statistics, I can get by if I just don’t make eye contact with his statistics when I pass them in the hall.
That weird statement there is my cue to exit. As you can see, I do like to look at baseball stats..so that pretty much makes me the coolest person alive. Maybe I can get Tony to talk about some Rangers projected stats. He is supposed to do some draft analysis, so if he does that, be ready to be amazed.
Cory